Supreme Court remands veterinary disease control decision for substantive review of proportionality and effectiveness.

The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Administrative Court for a substantive review of the veterinary inspector's decision regarding livestock disease eradication measures. The plaintiff argued that culling was necessary because the disease was incurable, while the inspector chose isolation and milk pasteurization. The court found the lower court failed to properly assess the proportionality and effectiveness of the chosen measures against the economic interests of the farmer.