Supreme Court dismissed appeal; teacher's contract was civil, not labor, due to lack of subordination.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a teacher against a labor court ruling that denied her employment status. The court found that the agreement between the parties was a civil contract for work rather than a labor contract because it lacked essential elements of subordination and employee protection. Consequently, the court upheld the lower court's decision that the relationship was governed by civil law principles.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 22 § 1 KP; Art. 13, 14, 117 § 2 KP: A contract is classified as a labor contract only if it contains essential elements of subordination and employee protection; mere payment of remuneration or adherence to a schedule does not establish an employment relationship if the agreement is fundamentally civil in nature.