I PKN 415/00
AI generated
Employer's misleading reason for dismissal justifies restoring appeal deadline under Labor Code Art. 265.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed lower court rulings dismissing a teacher's claim to reinstate her appeal deadline. The court found the employer cited a false reason for dismissal, causing the employee to miss the deadline in good faith. Consequently, the Supreme Court ruled that this error justified restoring the time limit for filing the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 265 § 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: An employer's provision of a false reason for dismissal may justify restoring the deadline for filing an appeal if the employee acted under a mistake of fact.
Keywords
AI generated
Labor Code Article 265
Dismissal reason validity
Appeal deadline restoration
Employee mistake of fact
Good faith reliance
Labor relationship stability
Supreme Court cassation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 265 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 30 § 4 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 86 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 8 Kodeksu pracy
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PKN 645/98
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for reinstatement due to vague dismissal reasons and potential conflict of interest.
I PKN 9/99
Dismissal of cassation: invalid dismissal claim arises from lack of drunkenness proof, not employer's failure to specify cause.
I PKN 304/99
Polish Supreme Court dismissed appeal; fake dismissal reason equals failure to cite valid reason under Labor Code.