Labor law: Employee's refusal of new work terms proven by conduct under general civil law rules.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a labor court ruling that found the employee's refusal of new work terms valid. The lower court determined the employee's verbal refusal and subsequent sick leave constituted sufficient conduct to express her will, as the Labor Code did not specify a formal declaration method. The Supreme Court agreed, ruling that general civil law principles allow will to be expressed through any sufficiently revealing behavior, thereby upholding the termination of the employment contract.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 42 § 3 KP; Art. 60 KC; Art. 300 KP: The Labor Code does not prescribe a specific form for an employee's refusal of new work terms, so general civil law rules apply, allowing such refusal to be expressed through any conduct sufficiently revealing the employee's will.