I PKN 404/00 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; organizational order not a labor contract termination under Polish law.

Case Number I PKN 404/00

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2001-05-24

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding his dismissal from a veterinary position. The lower court found that the plaintiff's employment was based on an administrative appointment rather than a standard labor contract, making the dismissal an organizational act. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory termination procedures for labor contracts did not apply to this specific administrative relationship.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 15 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 5 stycznia 1991 r. Prawo budżetowe; Art. 3 ustawy z dnia 1 lipca 1949 r. o zakładach leczniczych dla zwierząt: An administrative order establishing an organizational statute does not constitute a labor contract or a termination thereof, but rather an act of organizational knowledge without legal consequences for the employment relationship.

Keywords

AI generated

administrative appointment labor contract distinction organizational order veterinary inspector dismissal procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 15 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 5 stycznia 1991 r. Prawo budżetowe

Art. 3 ustawy z dnia 1 lipca 1949 r. o zakładach leczniczych dla zwierząt

Art. 23 ustawy z dnia 25 listopada 1970 r. o warunkach zdrowotnych żywności i żywienia

Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 2 lutego 1996 r. o zmianie ustawy - Kodeks pracy

Art. 42 § 1 Kodeksu pracy

Art. 42 § 4 Kodeksu pracy

Art. 45 § 1 Kodeksu pracy

Art. 58 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r.

Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; organizational order not a labor contract termination under Polish law.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text