Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 197/00 AI generated

Supreme Court held administrative court must consider factual context when interpreting undefined legal terms.

Case Number III RN 197/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially overturned the Administrative Court's decision regarding a pension fund statute change. The Administrative Court had rejected the Ministry's appeal by re-evaluating the factual findings on the 'interest of members' concept. The Supreme Court ruled that while the Administrative Court must verify procedural compliance, it cannot re-examine the substantive factual accuracy of the administrative body's determinations without a full evidentiary trial.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 22 ust. 2 ustawy o organizacji i funkcjonowaniu funduszy emerytalnych; Art. 328 § 2 KPC; Art. 8, 9, 11 KPA; The administrative court must interpret undefined legal terms by considering the specific factual context of the case rather than through abstract interpretation, and its review of factual findings is limited to procedural compliance.

Keywords

AI generated
undefined legal terms administrative court review factual findings pension fund statute procedural compliance interest of members statutory interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 22 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 28 sierpnia 1997 r. o organizacji i funkcjonowaniu funduszy emerytalnych
Art. 328 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego
Art. 8, 9, 11 Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego
Art. 59 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
art. 67 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text