Supreme Court held administrative court must consider factual context when interpreting undefined legal terms.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court partially overturned the Administrative Court's decision regarding a pension fund statute change. The Administrative Court had rejected the Ministry's appeal by re-evaluating the factual findings on the 'interest of members' concept. The Supreme Court ruled that while the Administrative Court must verify procedural compliance, it cannot re-examine the substantive factual accuracy of the administrative body's determinations without a full evidentiary trial.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 22 ust. 2 ustawy o organizacji i funkcjonowaniu funduszy emerytalnych; Art. 328 § 2 KPC; Art. 8, 9, 11 KPA; The administrative court must interpret undefined legal terms by considering the specific factual context of the case rather than through abstract interpretation, and its review of factual findings is limited to procedural compliance.