Supreme Court dismissed appeal on civil procedure value thresholds for non-employment relationship disputes.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal regarding a dispute over a functional allowance, ruling that the case did not involve the existence or termination of an employment relationship. The court determined that because the employment contract remained intact, the special valuation rules of Article 231 of the Civil Procedure Code did not apply. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible because the dispute value remained below the statutory threshold for cassation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 231 KPC; Art. 392 § 1 KPC: Special valuation rules for employment disputes apply only to claims regarding the establishment, existence, or termination of the employment relationship; disputes over functional allowances without contract termination are valued under general rules.