III SZ 1/01
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal as disciplinary proceedings under Civil Service Act do not allow Supreme Court cassation.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court rejected Edward N.'s cassation appeal against a disciplinary ruling regarding his conduct during a tax audit. The appellant argued for civil procedure application and Supreme Court jurisdiction, but the court found the disciplinary framework under the Civil Service Act exclusive. Consequently, the court held that cassation is inadmissible because the specific statutory provisions for disciplinary appeals do not permit review by the Supreme Court.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 119 ust. 2, 3 ustawy o służbie cywilnej; Art. 1, 2 § 1, 392, 393 § 1 KPC: Disciplinary proceedings governed by the Civil Service Act are excluded from the general civil procedure code and do not permit cassation to the Supreme Court.
Keywords
AI generated
disciplinary proceedings
civil service act
cassation inadmissibility
tax audit authority
jurisdiction limits
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 16 września 1982 r. o pracownikach urzędów państwowych
Art. 107 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z 18 grudnia 1998 r. o służbie cywilnej
Art. 119 ust. 2 i ust. 3 ustawy o służbie cywilnej
Art. 1 KPC
Art. 2 § 1 KPC
Art. 392 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC