Supreme Court quashes social insurance termination ruling due to flawed factual findings on employment relationship end.

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's decision terminating the applicant's social insurance obligation, remanding the case for a new trial. The lower courts had ruled that the employment relationship ended by mutual agreement when the employer granted unpaid leave and ceased operations, but failed to establish the applicant's consent to termination. The Supreme Court found this factual determination arbitrary because the record lacked evidence of the applicant's agreement to end the contract, noting that merely performing fewer tasks does not equate to termination. Consequently, the court held that the statutory basis for terminating insurance coverage could not be applied without first correcting these procedural and factual errors.