I PKN 285/00
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed cassation against labor judgment regarding overtime pay and evidence admissibility.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against a lower court's labor judgment. The plaintiff sought overtime pay, travel allowances, and recognition of difficult working conditions, while the defendant argued for specific evidentiary measures. The court rejected the appeal because the defendant's evidence request was deemed solely intended to delay proceedings under Article 217 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the cassation arguments regarding procedural violations were found unsubstantiated.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 217 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: Evidence requested solely to delay proceedings is inadmissible, and cassation appeals must be strictly limited to the grounds specified in the lower court's judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal
delay tactic evidence
overtime compensation claim
labor law standards
procedural time limits
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 217 § 1 KPC
art. 217 § 2 KPC
art. 223 § 1 KPC
art. 385 KPC
art. 393 § 1 KPC
art. 227 KPC
art. 134 § 1 KP
Cited Case Law
AI generatedC.I. 2340/35, Zb.Urz. 1937 r. poz. 431
III CR 795/64, PiP 1966 r. nr 4-5, s. 831
I PKN 585/98, OSNAPiUS 2000 r. nr 7, poz. 268