I PKN 276/00
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses union activist's appeal, upholding dismissal for drunkenness despite special protection laws.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed Stefan L.'s cassation appeal against his dismissal from PKP, upholding the lower courts' decision. The court found that while the employee was a union official, his drunkenness constituted a serious breach of duty warranting termination. The court rejected the claim that the dismissal violated special protection statutes because the severity of the misconduct justified the action without union consent.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.: Special protection for union officials does not preclude dismissal for serious misconduct like drunkenness, and cassation must demonstrate procedural errors or logical flaws in evidence assessment, not merely alternative fact evaluations.
Keywords
AI generated
union official dismissal
drunkenness at work
special protection statutes
cassation appeal
evidence assessment
serious breach of duty
labor law protection
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PKN 571/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim for selling private drugs during work, allowing damages instead.
I PKN 475/97
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling union protection overrides general misconduct dismissal rules.
I PKN 13/98
I PKN 469/98
I PKN 23/97
Supreme Court dismisses appeal allowing damages instead of reinstatement for union leader dismissed for drinking.
I PKN 440/97
I PKN 490/97