Supreme Court dismisses appeal for inadmissible amendment of legal basis in post-appeal procedural document.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a professor against the Higher School of Firefighting. The plaintiff attempted to substitute the legal grounds cited in the appeal with different provisions after the deadline had passed. The court ruled that such a substitution constitutes an inadmissible amendment of the lawsuit under Article 383 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the new legal basis could not alter the outcome based on facts established in the first instance.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 383 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego; Art. 393 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: It is inadmissible to replace the legal provisions cited as the basis for cassation with other provisions in a procedural document submitted after the deadline.