Supreme Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible because supplementary circumstances were submitted after the filing deadline expired.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court rejected the appellant's cassation appeal because the required supplementary circumstances were submitted after the statutory deadline for filing had passed. Although the court initially invited the appellant's representative to provide these circumstances, the submission occurred on October 16, 2000, exceeding the September 28, 2000, deadline. The court ruled that such supplementation is ineffective once the time limit expires, rendering the appeal inadmissible under the Civil Procedure Code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3933 § 1 pkt 3 KPC; Art. 3934 KPC; Art. 3935 KPC; Art. 3938 KPC: Supplementary circumstances for cassation must be submitted within the statutory filing period; failure to do so renders the appeal inadmissible and non-remediable.