Supreme Court dismissed appeal; mixed employment/civil contract deemed civil due to lack of subordination and third-party replacement.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected the plaintiff's claim for overtime pay and other employment benefits. The court found that while the relationship had elements of both employment and civil contracts, the presence of third-party replacement and lack of subordination meant the prevailing nature was civil. Consequently, the court held that the lower courts correctly interpreted the law and applied it to the established facts without error.