Supreme Court dismisses appeal; collective agreement interpretation requires joint explanation by parties under Art. 2416 KP.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the employer against a lower court awarding a jubilee bonus to the employee. The lower court interpreted a collective agreement clause to require three years of service, allowing the employee to count prior employment periods, whereas the employer argued for a strict literal reading. The Supreme Court ruled that Article 2416 of the Labour Code does not grant parties a monopoly on interpreting the agreement and that the parties failed to provide a joint explanation of the clause's meaning.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 2416 KP; Art. 9 § 1 KP; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: The Labour Code does not grant parties to a collective agreement a monopoly on interpreting its provisions; courts may interpret collective agreements as a source of law, provided parties have not jointly explained the terms.