Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 249/00 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; collective agreement interpretation requires joint explanation by parties under Art. 2416 KP.

Case Number I PKN 249/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the employer against a lower court awarding a jubilee bonus to the employee. The lower court interpreted a collective agreement clause to require three years of service, allowing the employee to count prior employment periods, whereas the employer argued for a strict literal reading. The Supreme Court ruled that Article 2416 of the Labour Code does not grant parties a monopoly on interpreting the agreement and that the parties failed to provide a joint explanation of the clause's meaning.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 2416 KP; Art. 9 § 1 KP; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: The Labour Code does not grant parties to a collective agreement a monopoly on interpreting its provisions; courts may interpret collective agreements as a source of law, provided parties have not jointly explained the terms.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement interpretation joint explanation of terms labour code article 2416 jubilee bonus award cassation appeal dismissal source of labour law literal vs teleological interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 2416 KP
Art. 9 § 1 KP
Art. 2411 pkt 3 KP
Art. 386 § 6 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text