Supreme Court dismissed cassation; factual finding on pregnancy term stands without procedural challenge.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against the lower court's judgment regarding the extension of a fixed-term employment contract due to pregnancy. The lower courts established that the employee was in her thirteenth week of pregnancy when the contract was terminated, triggering statutory protection under Article 177 § 3 of the Labor Code. The Supreme Court ruled that the factual finding regarding the pregnancy timeline was binding in cassation proceedings because the appellant failed to raise specific procedural objections or cite the correct material law provisions governing the calculation of continuous time periods.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 177 § 3 KP; Art. 393 § 11, 15 KPC: In cassation proceedings, a factual finding remains binding if the appeal does not contain specific procedural objections or cite the correct material law provisions regarding the calculation of continuous time periods.