Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 589/00 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; dismissal of assistant prosecutor is valid if performance is merely adequate, not excellent.

Case Number I PKN 589/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Paweł C. against the dismissal of his employment contract as an assistant prosecutor. The court found that the lower court correctly determined that fulfilling labor obligations under the Labor Code does not equate to being deemed suitable for the prosecutor profession. Consequently, the General Prosecutor's decision to dismiss the employee after a two-year tenure was upheld because his performance was only adequate rather than excellent.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 100 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: Wykonywanie obowiązków pracowniczych na poziomie wymaganego Kodeksem pracy nie jest równoznaczne z uznaniem przydatności do wykonywania zawodu prokuratora, co uprawnia Prokuratora Generalnego do zwolnienia za wypowiedzeniem po upływie okresu powołania.

Keywords

AI generated
dismissal of assistant prosecutor suitability for prosecutor role adequate versus excellent performance labor code obligations prosecutorial hierarchy evaluation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 100 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 224 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 227 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text