Supreme Court dismissed appeal; dismissal of assistant prosecutor is valid if performance is merely adequate, not excellent.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Paweł C. against the dismissal of his employment contract as an assistant prosecutor. The court found that the lower court correctly determined that fulfilling labor obligations under the Labor Code does not equate to being deemed suitable for the prosecutor profession. Consequently, the General Prosecutor's decision to dismiss the employee after a two-year tenure was upheld because his performance was only adequate rather than excellent.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 100 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: Wykonywanie obowiązków pracowniczych na poziomie wymaganego Kodeksem pracy nie jest równoznaczne z uznaniem przydatności do wykonywania zawodu prokuratora, co uprawnia Prokuratora Generalnego do zwolnienia za wypowiedzeniem po upływie okresu powołania.