Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZ 85/00 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal on appeal deadline restoration as inadmissible under specific procedural rules.

Case Number I PZ 85/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the lower court's rejection of a request to restore the deadline for filing an appeal. The appellant, represented by a newly appointed lawyer, argued that the initial lawyer's notification was delayed and that the request was filed as quickly as possible, but the lower court found no sufficient justification under the Civil Procedure Code. The Supreme Court ruled that the appeal against the rejection of the deadline restoration request was procedurally inadmissible because the law only permits appeals against rejections of the appeal itself, not against procedural orders regarding the appeal's filing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 380, Art. 39319 KPC; An appeal against a court order rejecting a request to restore the deadline for filing an appeal is inadmissible, as the Supreme Court may only review appeals against orders rejecting the appeal itself.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code appeal deadline restoration inadmissible appeal procedural order Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 380 KPC
Art. 39319 KPC
Art. 397 KPC
Art. 169 § 1 KPC
Art. 171 KPC
Art. 3934 KPC
art. 45 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text