Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 175/00 AI generated

Supreme Court allows new evidence in second instance to clarify disputed facts despite appeal prohibition.

Case Number II UKN 175/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the appellate court's decision denying the applicant a disability pension. The lower court had refused to admit new medical evidence, citing Article 384 of the Code of Civil Procedure which prohibits worsening the appellant's situation. The Supreme Court ruled that this prohibition does not bar necessary supplementary evidence required to resolve factual disputes between parties. Consequently, the case was remanded for a new trial where such evidence could be properly evaluated.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 384 KPC; Art. 63 ust. 1 ustawy o z.e.p.; The prohibition against worsening an appellant's situation does not forbid the admission of necessary supplementary evidence in the second instance if such evidence is essential for clarifying disputed facts between the parties.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure supplementary evidence second instance procedure disability pension prohibition of worsening situation declaratory decision remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 384 KPC
Art. 63 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
Art. 186 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach
Art. 1, 3 i 7 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 25 listopada 1986 r. o organizacji i finansowaniu ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 2 ust. 1, 2 i 3, Art. 3 ust. 1 pkt 1 oraz Art. 66 i 68 pkt 1 b ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text