Supreme Court allows appeal against premature dismissal, ruling negative council stance on legal violation notice is validly communicated.

The Supreme Court overturned the lower court's dismissal of the appeal, ordering a retrial by the Administrative Court. The lower court rejected the complaint because the city council allegedly failed to respond to a council member's notice to remove a legal violation within the statutory period. However, the Supreme Court found the factual basis of this dismissal questionable, noting the council had effectively communicated its negative stance during a session. Consequently, the court held that the specific form of communication is irrelevant as long as the refusal is sufficiently disclosed to the party.