Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 118/00 AI generated

Supreme Court remands case for further evidence when doubts arise regarding applicant's credibility under Polish Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number II UKN 118/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland remanded the case to the appellate court for a retrial after finding significant doubts regarding the applicant's credibility. The lower court had rejected the applicant's claims about establishing an employment relationship based on testimony that appeared inconsistent with documentary evidence. The Supreme Court ruled that when such doubts exist, the court must order further evidence collection rather than dismissing the applicant's claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 232 ust. 1 KPC; Art. 248-250 KPC: When a court of appeal raises doubts about the credibility of evidence essential for the decision, it must order further evidence collection to verify the facts rather than dismissing the claim.

Keywords

AI generated
credibility doubts court of appeal further evidence employment relationship civil procedure code remand for retrial social insurance benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 232 KPC
Art. 248-250 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text