Employment contract termination by appointment is invalid if less favorable than general statutory rules.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a labor court ruling that rejected an employee's claim for damages regarding his termination. The court found that the employer had validly terminated the employment contract without notice due to the employee's serious breach of duty by failing to report to work after vacation. Consequently, the court held that the specific termination clause in the employment agreement was invalid because it offered less favorable conditions than the general statutory rules governing contract termination.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 70 § 1 KP; Art. 18 § 2 KP: A provision in an employment contract permitting termination by appointment is invalid if it is less favorable to the employee than the generally applicable statutory rules on the termination of employment contracts.