I PKN 133/00
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; hourly rate in contract does not prove employment relationship.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the existence of an employment relationship. The lower court found that the plaintiff was an employee based on subordination and hourly pay, despite the written contracts being for work done. The Court ruled that an hourly rate is not exclusive to employment and that the lack of subordination, proven by facts, meant the relationship was civil, not labor.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 22 § 1, § 11 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 627, 628 § 1 Kodeksu cywilnego: The existence of an employment relationship depends on the predominance of subordination, not on the hourly rate or the name of the contract.
Keywords
AI generated
employment relationship
work done contract
subordination test
hourly rate
labor law vs civil law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 22 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 22 § 11 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 627 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 628 § 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego