Supreme Court dismissed pension claim for early retirement due to work in special conditions. Claimant failed to prove job details matched the specific list required for early retirement rights.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the pensioner's cassation appeal against the Social Insurance Institution's refusal of early retirement benefits. The claimant argued that his duties as a mechanic and transport equipment manager included tasks listed in Annex A, which would qualify for early retirement, but the court found the official record correctly identified his work as falling under Annex C. The court ruled that the claimant improperly attempted to rewrite factual findings and misdirected procedural complaints against the first-instance court, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 lutego 1983 r. Prawo do wcześniejszej emerytury nie przysługuje pracownikowi zatrudnionemu przy pracach wymienionych w wykazie C, a nie w wykazie A.