II UKN 61/00
AI generated
Social security benefits received based on a court order are not 'unjustified' if the court order was later overturned by extraordinary review.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court reversed the lower court's order requiring the return of social security benefits received between March 1995 and May 1996. The applicant had received these funds based on a valid court order establishing alimony, which was subsequently overturned by extraordinary review only in May 1996. The court held that because the applicant acted in good faith relying on a valid judicial decision, the benefits were not 'unjustified' under the relevant statute during that period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o funduszu alimentacyjnym art. 7 ust. 3; art. 10 ust. 1: Benefits received in good faith pursuant to a valid court order are not considered 'unjustified' for return purposes until the legal basis is formally revoked.
Keywords
AI generated
Fundusz Alimentacyjny
bezpodstawne pobranie
dobra wiara
egzekucja alimentów
rewizja nadzwyczajna
zwrot świadczeń
tytuł egzekucyjny
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 7 ust. 3 ustawy o funduszu alimentacyjnym
art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o funduszu alimentacyjnym
art. 393 § 15 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
§ 22 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 12 grudnia 1997 r.