Guaranteed salary excludes service allowance; court rejects procedural violations regarding statutory interpretation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed cassation appeals from both the plaintiff and the defendant regarding a guaranteed salary dispute. The plaintiff argued for inclusion of a service allowance, while the defendant contended it should be excluded based on statutory interpretation. The court ruled that the service allowance is not part of the guaranteed salary and that the appellate court correctly applied the law without violating procedural rules.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 81 § 1 KP; Art. 229 KPC; Art. 382 KPC; Art. 378 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: The guaranteed salary does not include service allowances, and courts must independently interpret law regardless of party arguments, with no violation of procedural rules if the decision is based on established facts and correct legal application.