Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SW 65/00 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal to reopen election protest proceedings as procedurally inadmissible under specific election law rules.

Case Number III SW 65/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected a request by Jan W. to reopen proceedings regarding a protest against the Presidential election. The applicant had previously withdrawn his protest, yet later filed a new motion to annul the election results. The court ruled that the election law provides an exhaustive list of remedies for protesters, explicitly excluding the possibility of filing a motion to reopen proceedings after a protest has been concluded by a Supreme Court decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej; art. 370 KPC w zw. z art. 406 KPC i art. 75 ust. 1 ustawy o wyborze Prezydenta: The election law regarding the validity of the Presidential election provides an exhaustive list of legal remedies for protesters, thereby excluding the possibility of filing a motion to reopen proceedings after a protest has been concluded by a Supreme Court decision.

Keywords

AI generated
election protest motion to reopen procedural inadmissibility exhaustive remedies Presidential election Supreme Court decision withdrawal of protest

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 370 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 406 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 75 ust. 1 ustawy o wyborze Prezydenta

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text