Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to insufficient value of the subject matter under procedural law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Henryk B. against a lower court's rejection of his request for a higher miner's pension multiplier. The appellant argued for a value of 8,271.60 zł based on a comparison with another individual, while the court determined the value should be the difference between the current and hypothetical higher pension, totaling 1,563.84 zł. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because this calculated amount fell below the statutory threshold for filing a cassation under Article 393 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 pkt 1 KPC; Art. 385 KPC: A criminal appeal is inadmissible if the value of the subject matter, calculated as the difference between the actual benefit and the hypothetical benefit under the contested provision, does not meet the statutory minimum threshold.