Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 123/00 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to insufficient value of the subject matter under procedural law.

Case Number II UZ 123/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Henryk B. against a lower court's rejection of his request for a higher miner's pension multiplier. The appellant argued for a value of 8,271.60 zł based on a comparison with another individual, while the court determined the value should be the difference between the current and hypothetical higher pension, totaling 1,563.84 zł. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because this calculated amount fell below the statutory threshold for filing a cassation under Article 393 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC; Art. 385 KPC: A criminal appeal is inadmissible if the value of the subject matter, calculated as the difference between the actual benefit and the hypothetical benefit under the contested provision, does not meet the statutory minimum threshold.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal inadmissibility value of subject matter miner's pension multiplier hypothetical benefit calculation procedural threshold requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 385 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text