Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 36/00 AI generated

Court rules expert fees are public law remuneration, not income subject to pension suspension under Polish Social Security Law.

Case Number II UKN 36/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the Social Insurance Fund's claim that an expert's court fees constituted taxable income requiring pension suspension. The insured argued his side business was incidental, but the court determined that fees paid by courts under specific public law statutes create a public-law relationship rather than a civil employment contract. Consequently, these specific payments were excluded from the income threshold that would otherwise trigger the suspension of pension benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent; Art. 278 § 1 KPC; Fees paid to experts by courts pursuant to public law statutes constitute public-law remuneration and do not count as income from employment or business activity for the purpose of suspending pension benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
public law relationship court expert fees pension suspension income threshold social security law remuneration classification civil vs public law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 października 1991 r. o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent, o zasadach ustalania emerytur i rent oraz o zmianie niektórych ustaw
Art. 278 § 1 KPC
Art. 287 KPC
Art. 288 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II CZ 39/74
III CZP 76/74
III CZP 22/96

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text