I PKN 52/00
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; moving teacher to inactive status requires union consent under Labor Union Act.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected a teacher's claim regarding her transfer to an inactive status. The teacher argued that the employer failed to obtain necessary union consent before making this unilateral change to her working conditions. The court held that such a transfer constitutes a detrimental change to employment terms under Article 32 of the Labor Union Act, mandating union approval.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 2 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Przeniesienie pracownika w stan nieczynny stanowi zmianę na niekorzyść warunków pracy i płacy, która wymaga zgody właściwego organu związku zawodowego.
Keywords
AI generated
Labor Union Act
inactive status transfer
union consent requirement
detrimental employment change
teacher employment rights
cassation appeal dismissal
unilateral employer action
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 32 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 38 KP
Art. 4771 § 2 KPC
Art. 386 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 2 KPC
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PKN 539/97, OSNAPiUS 1999 nr 3, poz. 87
I PKN 475/97, OSNAPiUS 1998 nr 23, poz. 683