Employer termination for refusal of work contrary to court order is invalid without considering employee's subsequent intent to comply.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding an employer's termination of an employee who refused a job assignment contrary to a prior court order. The employee initially refused the new role but later communicated acceptance to her lawyer, though the employer failed to verify this intent before dismissing her. The court held that the employer must consider the employee's actual motives and subsequent actions, rather than relying solely on the initial refusal, to determine the validity of the termination.