Supreme Court dismissed appeal; state official's job change by agreement without consent is valid if better than statutory terms.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor dispute involving a state official. The lower courts found that the employer modified the official's position and salary via mutual agreement, which the plaintiff contested as unlawful. The court ruled that such modifications are permissible under the relevant statute if they offer conditions more favorable than those guaranteed by law, and since the plaintiff failed to prove procedural violations, the appeal was rejected.