Long-term disruptive illness and school reorganization justify a teacher's transfer to inactive status.

The Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal seeking reinstatement and compensation after being transferred to inactive status. The court found that the employer's decision was lawful because the teacher had long-term disruptive illness preventing work and the school underwent reorganization requiring staff reductions. Consequently, the court ruled that the teacher's inability to take a health leave or retire did not override the school's interest in maintaining educational standards.