I PKN 22/00
AI generated
Employee consent invalid for employer deductions due to statutory prohibition and lack of specific agreement.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court partially quashed the lower court's ruling, ordering a retrial on the deducted amount while dismissing the rest of the appeal. The court found that an employee's general declaration consenting to deductions was invalid because it lacked specificity regarding the exact debts and violated mandatory labor laws. Consequently, the court held that such deductions were unlawful and the employer could not rely on the employee's vague consent.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 18 § 2 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 91 Kodeksu pracy: An employee's consent to deductions from wages is invalid if it does not specifically identify the debts and if the deduction violates mandatory statutory provisions.
Keywords
AI generated
employee consent validity
wage deduction prohibition
labor law mandatory rules
specific agreement requirement
employer liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 18 § 2 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 91 Kodeksu pracy
§ 2 uchwały Rady Ministrów z dnia 3 maja 1989 r.
§ 3 uchwały Rady Ministrów z dnia 3 maja 1989 r.
§ 10 ust. 1 uchwały Rady Ministrów z dnia 3 maja 1989 r.
§ 13 uchwały Rady Ministrów z dnia 3 maja 1989 r.
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 98 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego