Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 10/00 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling Art. 390 KPC does not mandate second-instance courts to refer legal issues to the Supreme Court.

Case Number I PKN 10/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Jan K. against the appellate court's decision in a patent remuneration dispute. The appellant argued that the lower court misinterpreted regulations regarding inventor rewards and that the appellate court should have referred a legal question to the Supreme Court under Article 390 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court rejected this, noting that Article 390 does not impose an obligation on second-instance courts to refer questions when cassation is available, and that the appellant had already utilized his cassation rights twice. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without a new interpretation of the relevant regulations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 390 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: The second-instance court is not obligated to refer a legal question to the Supreme Court even if it raises serious doubts, provided cassation is available to the parties.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal legal question referral Civil Procedure Code patent remuneration second instance court obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 390 KPC
art. 393 KPC
art. 98 ust. 7 ustawy z dnia 19 października 1972 r. o wynalazczości
§ 35 ust. 2 pkt 2 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 29 czerwca 1984 r.
§ 14 ust. 13 rozporządzenia z 29 czerwca 1984 r.
§ 18 załącznika do rozporządzenia z 31 stycznia 1986 r.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text