Supreme Court dismisses appeal as material law claims lack connection to inadmissibility ruling.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the plaintiff's material law claims regarding the disciplinary penalty had no connection to the lower court's decision on procedural inadmissibility. The plaintiff argued the penalty was invalid due to procedural errors and lack of employment contract, but the lower courts rejected the case under Article 199 § 1(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Supreme Court ruled that since the first-instance judgment was based solely on inadmissibility, the cassation court could not examine the substantive merits of the disciplinary penalty.