Supreme Court dismissed appeal for reinstatement where union head director's return violated social-economic purpose of labor law.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Dariusz M. against a regional court judgment ordering his reinstatement to a director position. The court found that while the employee had a valid claim for reinstatement due to a union protection violation, his specific conduct as both a director and union leader made his return incompatible with the social-economic purpose of labor law. Consequently, the court upheld the lower court's decision to reject the reinstatement claim based on his lack of cooperation skills and conflicting roles.