Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III RN 206/99 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled that a late appeal letter citing valid reasons constitutes a request to restore the filing deadline.

Case Number III RN 206/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny's decision rejecting the applicants' appeal as inadmissible due to a missed deadline. The applicants argued they missed the filing time not through fault, but because the administrative decision lacked the required court address. The court determined that the letter submitted within the correct procedural window, detailing these valid excuses, must be treated as a formal request to restore the deadline under the relevant administrative law provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 35 ust. 3 ustawy o NSA; Art. 58 § 1 i § 2 KPA w związku z art. 59 ustawy o NSA: A letter submitted within the statutory period alleging valid reasons for a missed deadline constitutes a request to restore the deadline, not an inadmissible appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
restoration of deadline missed filing time administrative appeal valid reasons Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny procedural remedy inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 35 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 r. o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 58 § 1 i § 2 KPA w związku z art. 59 ustawy o NSA
Art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Art. 393 § 1 KPC w związku z art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 45 ust.1 Konstytucji RP
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text