Supreme Court dismisses appeal because a lawyer's phone authorization lacks the required client signature for filing a cassation.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a social security court's rejection of a cassation. The lower court found that the lawyer's power of attorney, signed only by the lawyer, failed to authorize the filing of the cassation, which requires a signature from the client. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, ruling that a verbal authorization does not constitute a valid power of attorney under the Civil Procedure Code.