Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 15/00 AI generated

Social Security Court reviews rent agency decisions on social security contributions, allowing substantive judicial review.

Case Number III ZP 15/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that a Social Security Agency decision refusing to waive social security contributions is subject to substantive judicial review by the court. The rent agency argued that only formal procedural errors could be challenged, claiming the law reserves the power to waive debts solely for the agency. The court rejected this, establishing that under current legislation, courts must perform a substantive assessment of whether statutory conditions for waiving contributions are met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 28 ust. 2, 3 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 83 ust. 1 pkt 3, ust. 2 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 476 § 2 pkt 1 KPC; Art. 45 ust. 1, 77 ust. 2 Konstytucji: Courts retain the right to conduct a substantive review of rent agency decisions regarding the waiver of social security contributions, provided the decision falls outside the specific exceptions listed in the statute.

Keywords

AI generated
social security contributions waiver of debts substantive judicial review rent agency decisions civil procedure law administrative law constitutional rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 28 ust. 2, 3 of the Social Security System Act
Art. 83 ust. 1 pkt 3, ust. 2 of the Social Security System Act
Art. 476 § 2 pkt 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Art. 45 ust. 1 of the Constitution
Art. 77 ust. 2 of the Constitution

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text