Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review; administrative act by authorized deputy without explicit citation remains valid under Code of Administrative Procedure.

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the First President against a lower administrative court's decision voiding an act signed by a deputy mayor. The lower court declared the act invalid because the deputy mayor failed to explicitly cite his authorization on the document, arguing this violated rules on jurisdiction. The Supreme Court ruled that the Code of Administrative Procedure only requires the signature with name, surname, and official position, not a specific citation of the authorization, thereby upholding the validity of the act.