Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 11/00 AI generated

Court rules that leaving a case file unexamined under Art. 64 KPA requires no administrative decision but does require notification.

Case Number III ZP 11/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether leaving a case file unexamined under Article 64 of the Code of Administrative Procedure requires issuing an administrative decision. The Ombudsman argued that existing case law was inconsistent, with some courts treating this action as a formal decision while others viewed it as a non-action. The court held that while no formal decision is needed, the authority must still register the file and notify the applicant of the reason for non-examination to ensure procedural fairness.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 64 KPA; Art. 104 KPA: Leaving a case file unexamined pursuant to Article 64 of the Code of Administrative Procedure does not require the issuance of an administrative decision, but the authority remains obligated to register the application and notify the applicant of the grounds for non-examination.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Administrative Procedure non-examination of application administrative decision requirement procedural notification duty registration of application legal question resolution procedural fairness

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 64 KPA
Art. 104 KPA
Art. 10 KPA
Art. 61 § 4 KPA
Art. 39 KPA
Art. 40 KPA
Art. 41 § 1 KPA
Art. 41 § 2 KPA
Art. 145 § 1 pkt 4 KPA
Art. 6 KPA
Art. 14 KPA
Art. 10 § 3 KPA
Art. 237 § 3 KPA
Art. 238 KPA
Art. 17 of the Act on the Supreme Administrative Court

Cited Case Law

AI generated
NSA III SAB 14/85
NSA IV SA 1377/91

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text