Errors in a clerk's fee calculation do not violate the duty to return funds if the court acts as employer.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a court clerk against a labor court judgment ordering him to pay back fees. The clerk argued that errors in calculating his provisional remuneration violated his duty to return funds, but the court found no such violation. The court reasoned that since the regional court acted as the employer and made the final payment decision, clerical calculation errors did not constitute a breach of the duty to return entrusted funds under Article 124 of the Code of Civil Procedure.