I PKN 665/99
AI generated
Dismissal of discrimination claim where dismissal of a disabled employee due to budget shortage was lawful.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal seeking reinstatement after his employment contract with a municipal office was terminated. The court found that the employer lawfully cited a lack of budget funds for wages as an economic reason for dismissal under Article 45 of the Labor Code. Consequently, the court ruled that the termination did not constitute discrimination against the disabled employee.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 45 ust. 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 1 ust. 1 ustawy o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy: The termination of a disabled employee's contract due to a lack of budget funds constitutes a valid economic reason and does not amount to unlawful discrimination.
Keywords
AI generated
economic dismissal
labor code termination
disabled employee rights
public budget shortage
non-discrimination principle
reinstatement claim
municipal employment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 45 ust. 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 1 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy
Art. 65 ust. 5 Konstytucji RP
Art. 32 Konstytucji RP
Art. 393 § 12 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 69 Konstytucji RP
art. 32 Konstytucji RP
art. 65 ust. 5 Konstytucji RP