Supreme Court dismisses cassation when lower court's evidence evaluation and fact-finding are logically sound.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiffs against a labor court judgment awarding damages for theft. The lower court found that the defendant stole only partial components of dental materials rather than the entire set, rejecting the plaintiffs' claim of total misappropriation based on conflicting witness testimonies and the defendant's subsequent retraction of an initial statement. The court upheld the lower court's decision, ruling that the trial judge correctly exercised their free evaluation of evidence without violating procedural rules or logical reasoning standards.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 2 KPC; Art. 6 KC; Art. 300 KP; Art. 245 KPC; Art. 382 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC: A cassation appeal based on alleged procedural violations or errors in evidence evaluation and fact-finding must be rejected if the lower court's reasoning is logically consistent and respects the boundaries of free evidence assessment.