Labor law ruling: Appointment does not transform contract terms or create temporary position changes.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a worker against a regional labor court's decision. The worker sought reinstatement and damages after being removed from his position as a cooperative president, arguing the removal violated labor law and cooperative statutes. The court held that an appointment within an existing employment relationship does not alter the contract's substance or create a temporary new role, and that the removal was lawful under the relevant articles.