Supreme Court dismissed cassation, upholding equal pension calculation based on hypothetical wages at the closest former job position.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the lower court's judgment. The plaintiff, an electrician, sought a compensatory pension calculated based on the defendant company's current manager's salary, arguing it did not reflect his lost earning potential. The court ruled that since the plaintiff's former position no longer exists, the lower court correctly used the manager's salary as the closest comparable role to determine hypothetical wages. Consequently, the decision to base the pension on these hypothetical earnings was found not to violate the relevant Civil Code provision.