Employment contract renewal requires employer's explicit intent; unauthorized work does not imply new agreement.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a dispute over whether a new employment relationship was established after a fixed-term contract expired. The plaintiff argued that performing duties for several days without the employer's knowledge constituted implied consent to re-employment. The court ruled that such actions, performed without the employer's knowledge, do not demonstrate a mutual intent to renew the contract. Consequently, the court held that the employer's silence and lack of explicit intent precluded the formation of a new employment relationship.