Supreme Court dismisses cassation regarding social insurance early pension denial due to insufficient agricultural work duration. The court rejects procedural claims about legal representation and directness. The ruling confirms that occasional work does not count as full-time employment for pension purposes.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Maria B. against a lower court's denial of an early pension based on insufficient agricultural work history. The appellant argued that the court violated procedural rights by failing to inform her of the possibility of appointing a legal representative and by not adhering to the principle of directness in proceedings. The court rejected these claims, ruling that legal representation is not mandatory in social insurance cases and that the evidence clearly showed the appellant's work was merely occasional rather than full-time.