Supreme Court dismisses cassation for failure to prove intentional damage before applying statute of limitations.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a labor dispute judgment regarding the statute of limitations. The plaintiff argued that the employer's claim for intentional damage should have been considered to extend the limitation period, but the lower courts had not established this fact. The court ruled that without prior factual findings on whether the damage was intentional, the application of the shorter limitation period was legally correct, thus validating the dismissal of the claim.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 291 § 2 KP; Art. 383 KPC: A claim for intentional damage must be substantiated with specific facts before the statute of limitations can be extended; failure to establish this fact prior to applying the standard limitation period does not constitute a procedural violation warranting cassation.